The Never Ending Apology To Duke Lacrosse
I'm not sure the accused Duke lacrosse players even deserve an apology.
Certainly not apologies via incessant ESPN coverage, press conferences, irrational application of NCAA authority via grants of extended athletic ability or full page ads in the Wall Street Journal taken out last week.
After all, people have charges dropped against them every day. And remember, most people believed the accusations at first. That belief wasn't based on much. Mainly media. And now I guess we're supposed to believe something different just because the media says so.
Reasonable people can differ on this point. But my gut feeling is that something happened. I don't know whether or not what happened was against the law. But I don't feel that the accused lacrosse players are innocent of much.
And to be sure, except for all our respective gut feelings, the lacrosse players aren't definitely innocent. None of us know that for sure. Instead, they are simply guys who had charges dropped against them. At best, they are not guilty. But, certainly "innocence" is not the appropriate label for them from a legal perspective. Cases aren't prosecuted for a variety of reasons (including innocence, btw). But if the accuser declined to testify or if she was deemed unreliable to testify for whatever reason, that is not the same thing as the accused being "innocent." It's a distinction that shouldn't be overlooked.
And consider that the alleged lying whore who accused the Duke lacrosse players has yet to claim her 15 minutes of fame. Not even for the payday that would surely be coming to her for her side of the story. I don't think the networks, the prosecutors or even the accused can claim they declined the fruits of the spotlight.
Former Duke lacrosse coach, Mike Pressler, can't deny he accepted his 15 minutes of fame. ESPN "apologized" to him by awarding him his very own Sunday Conversation segment this past weekend. (BTW, he has a book coming out too.) However, Mike Pressler got exactly what he deserved. He should have been fired. Whatever the lacrosse team did that night, they did as a team. And a coach should have control of his team. No parent sent their son to Duke to get drunk and party with strippers. So, if that happened on Pressler's watch, he was, at a minimum, negligent in his job responsibilities. And when shit happens on your watch at work, you might get fired. So is life. Even though Pressler received a financial settlement from Duke (likely per contract), nonetheless, ESPN felt compelled to give this guy airtime to portray himself as some sort of sympathetic victim. I'm unimpressed.
And it should be said put out there that the accused players brought some of the shame, humiliation and negative attention from the accusations on themselves. Certainly, the initial spectacle was created by the media. However, the accused made a choice to stay in the spotlight. No stripper forced them to hold press conferences or otherwise make appearances on 60 Minutes, Good Morning America or similar programs. The accused conscientiously and unprovoked chose to embark on a legal strategy of trying the case in the media and turning the public against the accuser. Obviously, it was an excellent and successful legal strategy. And I don't begrudge them that. But the accused could have taken on a similarly aggressive behind the scenes defense. But they chose the spotlight and the media shouldn't have to apologize for giving it to them.
Maybe the accused Duke lacrosse players were wronged. It's possible they weren't. But I'm sick of hearing about it. And amidst all the mea culpas, the real lesson might be lost. If you want a date a Black girl, ignore your BET fantasies and just find a nice girl on campus.

13 comments:
Your tag line is "news and opinions from a knowledgeable and witty woman.
Yet you are posting about a case which you obviously have no knowledge. Mike Nifong was sent a letter three days after he began publicly speaking about the case asking him to desist or the defense team would have to go public. He refused and today the trial to disbar him begins. Why don't you explain just how much defendants should take publicly in the face of a lying DA and Nancy Grace among others in the media calling them rapists nightly.
Perhaps you could also include one fact that could lead a reasonable person to think a crime was committed. Just one.
You said:
"But if the accuser declined to testify or if she was deemed unreliable to testify for whatever reason, that is not the same thing as the accused being "innocent." It's a distinction that shouldn't be overlooked."
The woman wanted to continue with the case. She was deemed unreliable because she couldn't tell the same story twice and she was contradicted by every witness, including the other dancer , and the physical evidence. That is why the attorney general declared them innocent and said no crime had occurred (he didn't simply decline to prosecute).
I see your point, but you leave out how the media portrayed them (specifically Jackson, Sharpton and those Duke professor who took out a FULL PAGE AD in the news paper basically convicting these players in the court of public opinion). They had no choice but to appear on all those shows you speak of. The media circus started with the MEDIA and those who wanted thier "shine". Is the coverage beyond annying now? probably, but if the media is going to lambaste these kids for 6+ months, I guess it is only fair to kiss thier ass for 6+ months.
and you are right, people get "let-off" everyday, but many of those are not portrayed in the media like these kids were.
Finally your statment of "they are guilty of something" is at best disingenuous. how do you figure "something definitely happened"? And do you mean "guilty" in a legal way or a moralistic way? the former is slanderous with no proof and the latter is an obvious statement indicative of ALL of us.
This is not one of your "posts to be proud of." Where to begin? You have missed so many of the facts about this case it's sad.
A facts to chew on:
1. The players *never* asked for black strippers. They asked for white stippers and the agency screwed them and sent a couple of street whores masquerading as strippers. The false accuser was high on drugs and alcohol when she got there.
2. The lacosse party has to be one of the most well documented parties in the history of college parties. Time stamped videos and photos from multiple sources. Every eye-witness - 40+ lacrosse players, a couple of non-lacrosse players, a neighbor, a taxi driver, and the false accuser's own partner said "nothing happened." Read the three books that have or will come out about this case. Read the lacrosse blogs.
NOTHING HAPPENED, except the false accuser made up a rape allegation to get out of a 24 hour detention in a drunk tank. Do your homework for god's sake! Then come back and say "Something Happened."
3.The lacrosse players did not bring this one themselves. They were exploited by a "Rogue District Attorney" [As stated by the NC State Attorney General] for his own political and financial gain. These three men had to defend their innocence in the media. Because, they never received the presumption of innocence. They were guilty before they said a word.
I'm sick of people who have no clue about the criminal behavior of Mike Nifong and the Durham PD giving them a pass while fixating on the lacrosse players.
I think I was pretty clear that, in part, I am skeptical of the lacrosse players SOLELY on my gut feeling. Obviously, some people will feel different about that.
I am very well informed about this case and it is very complicated and could be talked about exhaustively. I am just trying to give some airtime to the gray areas. Everything is not black and white.
Nifong, who is starting his trial, fucked this case up - period. Still, it is important to distinguish what he did and the fundamental accusations. The Duke players may be innocent, but Nifong and accusations are two separate issues.
And, also, just be skeptical of "evidence" that is leaked to the media. Defense lawyers and investigators are paid hundreds of dollars an hour to do just that. It is no coincidence that so much of the information that came out in the media about this case was one-sided.
Of course, you are free to believe whatever you facts you want to. I am too. I'm just trying to point out that there are a lot of subjective aspects to this issue and that the players perhaps aren't necessarily entitled to the seemingly endless apology. Charges get dropped and wrongly accused people are vindicated everyday. Even if they are innocent, the Duke players aren't unique.
I understand your point, but you arestill missing the point that while people have charges dropped against them everyday, they are not subjected to Jackson, Sharpton, so-called "feminists", Duke professors and most of the media calling them "rapists" 24 hours a day when they haven't even been convicted.
I appreciate you looking at the "gray" areas which a lot of people don't do in today blogs/media world. i commend you for that.
You say you are just "skeptical of 'evidence' that is leaked to the media. Did you read Attorney General Roy Cooper's 21 page "Summary of Conclusions?" those are facts not defense spin. Have you read the written statements of the witnesses? Are you watching the Nifong trial on Court TV and hearing all the misdeeds and lies Nifong committed?
If we read just this single blog post of yours and use our "gut" to conclude that you are basically clueless are we jumping to conclusions?
By no means in this meant to be an authoritative or otherwise exhaustive post on the case. Hopefully, I am just tossing out a few more ideas to be considered.
Again, I have followed the case closely and I am very interested in Nifong's trial and will try to form my opinions source material.
I don't assume a police report is any more definitive than a witness making claims to a reporter. Or statements prepared by an elected official. Because that's what an attorney general is. Politics (and publicity) is part of that job too.
I am just being generally skeptical of all the parties in this case, as I am with all legal issues.
Otherwise, reasonable people can differ on their interpretation of the facts and credibility therein.
I was going to say that you forgot to credit a certain blogger for sending you the screen cap of the lacrosse ad (cough MCBIAS cough)...but after seeing these comments, maybe that was a good thing.
This is revenge for leaving you off the attractive bloggers apology list, isn't it? I assure you it was accidental and has nothing to do with me never having seen photographic evidence of your tangible existence, ha-ha.
Yes, it was you, MCBias, that personally provoked me into this post by sending me the ad. How could I be remiss in not sending some of the heat your way, lol? (Next week, OJ! j/k)
I have a beautiful spirit. Isn't that enough? Can't u just have faith that I'm attractive?
I do have faith in your general attractiveness :-) the voice and wittiness will do nicely. Don't take my teasing about the lack of picture seriously; I just like taunting other bloggers for being faceless, heh, just as I am faceless on here.
Wow, this is one of the dumbest things I've ever read... and that's saying a lot, since I've read some Anne coulter.
We can agree on one thing. If the Lacrosse players were black, Nancy Grace would have had to apologize or else lose her job. She's lucky they come from white suburbs up in NY and NJ.
Post a Comment